Sunday, July 31, 2011

Teaching

It occurred to me --- talking to professors about their students and labs researchers about their interns --- that there is a tendency to help those who can swim to swim faster and further, but how much do we help drowning students get ashore (at grad school level)?

6 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Great topic. There really should be discussion about this in the community. Five years is a long time and it's really sad if smart students don't get their shot at academia due to bad circumstances.

11:28 AM  
Blogger Peter said...

It depends on whether you view graduate school as an instructional process or a filtering process, and whether you prefer type 1 or type 2 errors.

4:23 AM  
Anonymous Tim said...

As a grad student, I'd be fine being left to drown by my advisor / department if I'd deserve it, as long as I would now from the beginning that this possibility is part of the game - which is often not the case when professors argue that one should go to grad school.

7:39 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anon: yes, five years is a long time, so one-sided errors have a huge cost. Many graduate students seem to internalize this some 3 years into the program!

Peter: Liked your comment that made me parse+think. One would think filtering should have happened at admissions, and rest should be instructional, but that is not true in theory or practice.

Tim: Right! We should communicate to graduate student entrants that they need to take responsibility for the process, and drowning is a real possibility. More so than other degrees, PhD might have a real failure path for some.

-- Metoo

10:42 PM  
Anonymous Tim said...

That's very interesting - I just finished my 3rd year and indeed I feel I internalized the perspective of potential failure (I wonder what stopped me until now).

I still feel I am a much better version of me as compared to 3 years ago (which did not happen while I worked in the industry), academia job or not.

That being said, I still feel there is a bit of cheating on the side of the barricade that filters humans after claiming 5 years of their lives. Filtering should be more aggressive in the initial stage (admission and 1st year) but this probably does not serve well the educational industry.

7:07 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Great, thought provoking post. There just is not enough time to teach someone drowning how to swim when we are already spread so thin. Lately, I have started thinking the same about students with poor English and communication skills. I wonder how senior colleafues are able to mentor international students that fit in this category.

12:01 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home